WHY 42? |

How to make news, not noise (hint…have a plan)

March 1st, 2013 by Mimi

 

I want to start blogging.

We must have a presence on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.

I want to advertise on Google, on the radio, in newspapers, in direct mail.

Let’s hold events.

 

We hear requests like these every week from clients. When we ask “why” they seem confused and wonder if we really understand new media and communications. In this age of instant information they ask why they should bother to take the time to set communication goals and write annual plans.

1. Set Goals that Set the Stage

Media are tools, not a strategy. Goals are the overall thing you want to change or affect, not the activity itself. They must tie in to the overall company strategy and the specific objectives of your organization. Make them clear, concise and concrete. Not: “Increase participation of the employee annual survey” but “Increase the annual employee survey participation by 50% and create and execute action plans by all organizations to address any issues that rank at 2 or below by May 30 with the overall goal of reducing turnover by 7% in 2013.”

Goals have to be shared, refined and, yes, communicated, to all interested parties. If your stakeholders’ ideas have been respectfully considered, they’ll be much more likely to support your progress and help when roadblocks happen. Collaboration at the initial planning stage means more creativity and ultimately more success.

2. Be Proactive Not Reactive

Sure, from time to time you’ll want to second good ideas or topics by retweeting or “liking” but to stand out from the noise you’ll want to be the one with the original ideas and stories. “Leading from behind” can be a great concept for management but not for communications. A proactive approach is necessary. Do the research, find the captivating stories, understand the data, create compelling and sustainable, targeted messages and then successfully execute the plan. Announcing an event date is fine but explaining what you’ll learn and why it’s a “must attend” for your audience is considerably better. Having a plan in place for crisis communications can save your reputation and your bottom line.

3. Choose Metrics That Matter

The number of tweets or retweets or dissecting Google Analytics is not a measurement in itself (although it can be useful to see activity and track trends). What’s important is to have your marketing or social media efforts move the needle in relation to your overall goals. Increasing the number of followers is nice but selling more products or services, growing membership, or increasing donations for your non-profit shows tangible results. Think conversions not conversation.

4. Turn Ideas into Action

A six-slide PowerPoint deck is not a communications plan. A detailed plan thinks through every aspect of the communications strategy to discover opportunities as well as barriers. An implementation plan explores audience needs and interests, understands the competitive landscape, creates targeted messaging, establishes timelines, determines communication vehicles and activities, works within financial guidelines, establishes benchmarks and metrics, and outlines the staffing plan with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. As Mark Twain said, “The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex, overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, then starting on the first one.”

5. Consider an Annual Theme

Just as companies create memorable slogans that endure and resonate with their audiences, communication plans should do the same. When I worked at WebEx, the theme for that year was “Radical Collaborator” not “Web Conferencing Solutions”. We created quarterly internal and external presentations surrounded by social media that introduced, and then enhanced, the theme using compelling, real life stories supported by proven data. This approach resulted in numerous impressions and increased the awareness of the company’s products, as well as the personal brand of the top executive. Every event was tweeted (pre-event, during the event and post-event), blogged about, re-presented on YouTube and re-messaged for new audiences.

For a non-profit client, we focused on telling how they were making a positive difference for women in high conflict areas. Each week a short “good news” story was told on various social media channels. People knew Friday was the day they could look forward to being inspired. People were engaged, stories were shared, followers greatly enhanced and, most important, and donations doubled.

6. Don’t "File and Forget"

An effective communications plan is reviewed and refined weekly. Use it to start every weekly department meeting. Have only one version and have it accessible by everyone who is responsible for implementation on a shared drive or in the cloud. As new events, products or services occur, add to the plan and determine new approaches and strategies. A flexible plan with a strong annual theme can absorb these additions and remain effective. Measure what works and what doesn’t and next year’s plan will be half written already. Planning means you’ll be in a much better position to be part of the news instead of part of the noise.

 

Mimi Garrity Denman, Account Director

Bookmark and Share





Measuring Social Media ROI

March 27th, 2012 by Steve Nelson

A spike in traffic - must be social media ROI!
I went to a lunch 'n learn last week sponsored by Molly Crawley at Med Ad Agency. Molly had asked me to think about the topic of social media return on investment (ROI). My first thought was there is not a one-size-fits-all model for considering social media ROI, and it would be unwise to oversimplify. When I hear clients balk at participating in social media platforms until or unless they can apply a highly accurate ROI model, I feel that they are missing an important consideration.

15 years ago or so some clients questioned whether they needed a website, or could justify the ROI. But the internet has become such a part of the operational and communications infrastructure of any company that the consideration is different. For most companies, if you don’t have a website, you don’t exist.

Social media is becoming an integral part of that infrastructure.

Infrastucture ROI models are different from calculating the return on a marketing campaign. Asking the ROI on an customer event you might plan at your headquarters is one thing. But you need a different model that covers having a headquarters in the first place, where it is located, what color it is painted, what the phone system is, who is in the mail room.  Have you calculated the ROI on your phone system lately?

It’s well and good to come up with plausable, testable and refinable models such as ROI. Develop a model, a hypothesis, and go from there. But you need to make sure that you are looking at all the different levels of necessity and return that can be covered by that model. Developing an infrastructure ROI model for social media can be instructive, but should not be the deciding factor for participation.

First of all, assume that social presence is required now to be included in the online space. Minimally this includes profile information that can be indexed, found, referenced and shared. Search engines are increasingly factoring this presence into their search results. For many consumers, if you aren’t in the search results you don’t exist. Beyond this, as I pointed out in my post on the Zero Moment of Truth, validation of your presence in the social space may also make or break the attraction of your customers. A survey I did for a client seven years ago showed that the existence of an independent blog community for their products and company increased the trust in that company and its own communications. Accelerate to today, and that community:trust ratio is even more critical.

Of course, you can still measure ROI on social media marketing campaigns, but this is a much different consideration from the initial choice to participate. As lunch 'n learn guest speaker Colin Cook of Thimble River Analytics pointed out, old-school linear conversion funnels have become much more convoluted with the feedback loops of social media. You can still use simple measurements such as click-throughs to desired conversion events with links that are carried through the social media. But you also want to develop models of how these links and the messages that carry them are uniquely spread and validated through networks of influence and the platforms that enable them.

How do you do that? First, you develop your model of how this influence might plausibly work, within and across online and social platforms. Once you have a model, you can use the platform-specific measurement systems, such as Facebook Insights; or general purpose measurement systems, such as Google Analytics, Webtrends or Adobe's Omniture; or you can look at the data requirements of your specific social proliferation model, and find many vendors that offer specialized measurement systems.

So embrace the infrastructure of social media as a given, model your general presence, model your social campaigns, and find the right tools to test and learn from your models.

Download the free Social Media Workbook from AP42

Bookmark and Share





And websites now will later be apps, for the times they are a changin’

May 27th, 2010 by Steve Nelson

Here's a blogging maxim: if you think of it, blog it now. I keep a notebook of potential posts and points of view and when I have an idea or insight rattling around, I jot it down. There it stays until I scan through the morning's RSS and see someone else who got off their ass and wrote it down and hit submit.

Nevertheless, I've been noticing an interesting crosscurrent: at the same time apps are becoming web sites, web sites are becoming apps. Nothing revolutionary; I just hadn't looked at these phenomena at the same time.

Piknik - a web-based photo editing app

Piknik - a web-based photo editing app

Apps are being replaced by web sites

Microsoft Word or Google Docs?  I'm still using Word 2004 for the Mac, which came on a CD-ROM and had some horrible activation system. (When I bought my daughter the educational version of Word for the Mac, the whole activation thing never really worked.) All I wanted was to create, edit, and publish well-formatted textual documents.  I saw Writely for the first time in 2005 at the Web 2.0 expo, and for the first time I noted a tipping away from OS-installed apps. I had experience with X-based systems and found them less than satisfactory. They usually made me adapt to the system rather than provide a system that was designed with me in mind.  Increasingly, though, browser-based apps, a hallmark of Web 2.0, have provided functionality previously seen only in apps.

Netflix app for iPad

Netflix app for iPad

Web sites are being replaced by apps

Here's the cross-current. Just as things I used to do with apps, I now do with my browser and a web service, things I used to do by going to a web site, I'm doing with an app on my iPad. This cognitive dissonance started on the iPhone (or in my case, iPod Touch), and continues in an even more pronounced way on my iPad. Though these devices have  built-in browsers and many sites have mobile-styled versions, true experience is best provided with native apps. Now content I used to go to a web site for is provided via a custom application. Here's IMDB, Time Magazine, NetFlix, Mashable, Wolfram Alpha, each with its own iPad app, each providing a much richer experience than their corresponding web sites.  These apps are so tailored to fit the device and its operating environment, it would be hard to duplicate on the web.

This ties into the whole platform ownership debate now boiling between Apple and Adobe. This is echoing the state of things a decade ago when Mac-native applications that tied into the Mac OS in a native way outshone apps that were designed to a common denominator (think Java apps).  App interfaces developed as browser-based, even standards-based, still won't be the perfect match of design, function, and platform.

That may be the rub, though. The advantage of standards-based interfaces is a more predictable user experience. Apple did a great job on the Mac of getting developers to use the standard interface toolkit to provide predictable experience, and while standard interfaces exist on the iPad, I'm seeing wider diversity of design in iPad apps. Will this provide better or diminished user experience? Time will tell.

Bookmark and Share